Trump on Trial
The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – Indictment# 71543/2023 – Indictment PDF
The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – Indictment# 71543/2023 – Statement of Facts PDF
The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – Indictment# 71543/2023 – Decisions & Court Orders
Day 23: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 30th, 2024
—–Court Transcript 05-30-24—–Verdict Sheet—–
After a second day of deliberations, and a total of more than eleven hours, the jury reached a verdict at 4:20pm EST, finding criminal defendant Donald J. Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. This making Trump the first former United States president in history to be charged and convicted of a felony. Judge Juan Merchan scheduled sentencing for July 11th, 2024 at 10am EST.
Day 22: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 29th, 2024
—–Court Transcript 05-29-24—–Jury Instructions & Charges—–
In Trump’s felony election interference trial involving the falsification of company records, the jury was given instructions as deliberations commenced today.
The jury in the criminal trial of the People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump was excused for the day after spending over four hours deliberating. The twelve-member panel will get back to deliberations tomorrow May 30th, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. ET.
Two notes were sent in today by the jurors, one asking to hear the jury instructions again, and the other asking to have portions of the testimony from witnesses Michael Cohen and David Pecker read aloud.
The verdict on the 34 felony counts of Trump’s falsifying business records pertaining to a hush money payment to an adult film star prior to the 2016 presidential election will be decided during these deliberations.
Day 21: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 28th, 2024
—–Court Transcript 05-28-24—–
A crucial day arrived on May 28, 2024, when the prosecution and defense presented their closing arguments. Accusations that Trump falsified financial documents to hide an alleged affair during the 2016 election form the basis of the prosecution’s case. Central prosecution witness Michael Cohen is said to have given incriminating testimony, while Trump’s defense team calls Cohen a disreputable witness and refers to him as the “MVP of liars.”
Todd Blanche, the defense attorney for Trump, led the team’s forceful defense, highlighting claiming a lack of hard evidence to connect Trump to the purported hush money payment to Stormy Daniels outside of Cohen’s testimony. Blanche pointed out contradictions in Cohen’s remarks and cast doubt on his veracity, arguing that it would be unfair to find Trump guilty based only on Cohen’s claims.
Joshua Steinglass, the assistant district attorney, refuted Blanche’s claims with supporting documentation and witness accounts, including that of David Pecker, the former head of AMI. Steinglass disputed Blanche’s claims about a particular phone call, arguing that it was crucial to proving Trump’s complicity in the purported plot.
Steinglass methodically outlined the prosecution’s case, presenting Trump as the main beneficiary of the hush money transfer that Cohen and Pecker arranged. He portrayed Trump, Pecker, and Cohen as working together, and he claimed that there was a deliberate attempt to hide harmful material during the pivotal moments of the 2016 presidential campaign.
In the defense, Blanche attempted to challenge the prosecution’s storyline by claiming that Trump handled the payments to Cohen with no malice. He claimed that there is no proof that Trump planned to cheat or had a direct hand in arranging the payment. According to Blanche, Cohen is an untrustworthy storyteller who is more interested in his own goals than in the facts.
After the conclusion of the closing arguments, the case will now be decided by the jury, which consists of five women and seven men. They have been charged with considering the 34 charges against Trump, and it is anticipated that they will make a decision soon. As both parties wait for the jury’s decision, alternate jurors are still available, emphasizing the seriousness of the proceedings.
Day 20: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 21st, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-21-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-21-24—–
After only two witnesses taking the stand on Day 20 of the trial in The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, the defense rested its case. The first witness was a paralegal, and the second was Michael Cohen’s former lawyer, Robert Costello.
Cohen was a major prosecution witness, and Costello’s evidence was meant to cast doubt on him. Under cross-examination, however, prosecutors produced emails that Costello had himself written, demonstrating that despite pretending to be Cohen’s attorney, he had attempted to influence Cohen and discourage him from assisting federal investigators. “We need to get Michael Cohen on the right page without giving him the appearance that we’re following instructions from Giuliani or the President,” according to one email from Costello.
The prosecution’s use of Costello’s own comments from the emails to challenge him further tainted his testimony, leading him to concede that “the email speaks for itself.”
Jurors apparently listened intently when questions about Costello’s trustworthiness were raised.
Notably, former President Donald Trump refrained from testifying despite having earlier declared he would do so. After only two witnesses, the defense rested its case, which was viewed as a calculated effort to spare Trump from potentially damaging cross-examination.
Closing arguments were scheduled for May 28th, following Memorial Day weekend, while the defense rested.
Day 19: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 20th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-20-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-20-24—–
In the trial of The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, the prosecution concluded its case after presenting testimony from 20 witnesses over 15 days. Among the witnesses called was David Pecker, Keith Davidson, Stormy Daniels, and Michael Cohen. Cohen, a key witness, gave testimony that spanned four days and lasted for more then 17 hours. Cohen faced intense scrutiny from Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche, who attempted to attack his credibility by alleging that Cohen fabricated conversations where Trump purportedly directed him to pay adult film star Stormy Daniels.
Following the prosecution’s case, Trump’s defense began with the testimony of Costello, aimed at refuting Cohen’s claims of pressure during the FBI search of his home and office in 2018. However, Costello’s demeanor in court irked the judge when Costello spoke over Judge Merchan and had multiple audible outbursts, leading to the threat of removal from the stand and striking his testimony. As the trial moved forward, Trump’s attorneys signaled their intention to rest their case after Trump’s testimony, opting not to call further witnesses.
Judge Merchan weighed the timing of closing arguments, considering the Memorial Day weekend and the potential disruption to jury deliberations. Ultimately, it was decided that closing arguments would take place the following Tuesday, May 28th. Amidst the legal maneuvering, Cohen made headlines by admitting to stealing $60,000 from the Trump Organization during cross-examination. Cohen claimed to then-Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg that he had a need to be reimbursed for a payment he made to a tech company on behalf of Donald Trump.
Cohen’s testimony was marked by his potential financial stake in the trial’s outcome, with Cohen claiming “It’s better if he’s not[guilty], for me, because it gives me more to talk about in the future.” referencing his avenues of income such as his podcasts and TikTok revenues. Despite pleading guilty to tax crimes unrelated to Trump, Cohen primarily blamed Trump for his legal woes, leading to debates over his credibility. The admission of a photo pertaining to the timing of a call placed by Cohen to Keith Schiller and Donald Trump added fuel to these debates, especially concerning the authenticity of conversations between Cohen and Trump regarding an update on information about Stormy Daniels. Cohen asserted that he had conversed with Trump more than 20 times about the matter, affirming his recollection of specific discussions related to Daniels.
The trial’s progression highlighted the contentious nature of the proceedings, with both sides vigorously defending their positions. As the defense prepared to conclude its case, the focus remained on the credibility of witnesses and the weight of evidence presented. With closing arguments on the horizon, the outcome of the trial is expected to hinge on the jury’s assessment of the testimony and the legal arguments put forth by both sides.
Day 18: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 16th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-16-24—–Defense Evidence – 05-16-24—–
Day 18 of the trial marked a dramatic confrontation between Donald Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche, and key witness Michael Cohen. Blanche accused Cohen of fabricating a phone conversation with Trump in 2016 before the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels’ attorney, citing text messages exchanged between Cohen and Keith Schiller, challenging Cohen’s memory and credibility. This intense cross-examination aimed to cast doubt on Cohen’s recollection of significant interactions with Trump and was described as the trial’s most dramatic moment so far. The court recessed on Friday to allow Trump to attend his son Barron’s high school graduation, with Cohen’s cross-examination set to resume the following Monday and possible summations beginning as early as Tuesday.
During the cross-examination, Blanche probed Cohen on various topics, including his guilty plea on tax charges, his aspirations to work in the White House, and his discussions about a potential pardon from Trump. Cohen defended himself, claiming he was a victim of a corrupt prosecution and that he sought a pardon to end his legal ordeal after being prompted by Trump’s suggestive remarks about the possibility of pardoning him. Trump’s response to Cohen’s testimony was relatively subdued, with minimal reaction during prosecutors’ questioning but a noticeable shift in demeanor as attention turned to Cohen and the media. In contrast, Cohen maintained a calm demeanor throughout his testimony, carefully choosing his words and speaking deliberately.
The trial’s conclusion seemed imminent, with Judge Merchan indicating the possibility of summations starting as early as Tuesday, signaling that the jury could receive the case next week. The defense planned to call a campaign finance expert, and there remained uncertainty about whether Trump would testify in his defense. Additionally, former Cohen attorney Bob Costello’s potential appearance loomed, as he disputed Cohen’s testimony and accused him of lying about their interactions. As the trial nears its end, the contrasting narratives presented by the defense and prosecution, along with the credibility of key witnesses like Cohen, continue to shape the trajectory of the case.
Day 17: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 14th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-14-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-14-24—–Defense Evidence – 05-14-24—–
Day 17 of Donald Trump’s trial for alleged hush money payments saw his attorney, Todd Blanche, engaging in a confrontational cross-examination of Michael Cohen. Blanche focused on discrediting Cohen’s credibility, questioning him about his public statements on platforms like TikTok and his financial gains from books and podcasts critical of Trump. The aim was to undermine Cohen’s allegations against Trump and portray him as motivated by personal vendetta and financial gain, particularly after losing his law license due to his involvement in the hush money scheme.
The trial shed light on Cohen’s post-2018 activities, revealing his reliance on social media and other platforms to sustain himself financially and to express his grievances against Trump. Blanche’s line of questioning aimed to sway the jury’s perception of Cohen’s motives, emphasizing his change in attitude toward Trump following his guilty plea and the FBI’s seizure of his records. Cohen’s admission to lying on behalf of Trump during the Russia investigation and his subsequent decision to end his loyalty were highlighted, suggesting a shift driven by self-preservation and familial considerations.
The courtroom atmosphere was charged with political undertones as prominent Trump sycophants and Republican figures, including Senators Rick Scott and J.D. Vance, rallied behind Trump, denouncing the trial proceedings. Trump’s daughter-in-law, Laura Trump, also made an appearance, reflecting a unified front against what supporters claim to be a “politically motivated prosecution”. Despite efforts to undermine Cohen’s testimony, the prosecution sought to solidify its case, with Cohen being the final witness. Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass confirmed this, indicating that the prosecution was nearing the conclusion of its case against Trump.
As the trial progresses, the clash between Trump’s defense and the prosecution intensifies, with each side seeking to shape the narrative and influence the jury’s decision. Cohen’s testimony, coupled with the scrutiny of his motivations and past actions, underscores the complexity of the legal battle and its broader implications for Trump’s political legacy and the future of his associates. The courtroom spectacle not only serves as a legal battleground but also as a platform for partisan politics, reflecting the polarization surrounding Trump’s presidency and the ongoing debate over accountability and justice.
Day 16: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 13th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-13-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-13-24—–
In the latest development of the trial, Michael Cohen’s testimony took center stage, directly implicating Donald Trump in a hush money scheme aimed at paying off Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 election. Cohen detailed how he disbursed $130,000 at Trump’s behest, with the promise of reimbursement, linking Trump to alleged lawbreaking by falsifying business records to cover up the payment. Despite Trump’s plea of not guilty and denial of any affair with Daniels, Cohen’s testimony painted a vivid picture of Trump’s involvement in the transaction, recounting conversations during negotiations and Trump’s awareness of the reimbursement process in 2017.
Cohen’s testimony delved into the intricacy of the scheme, including his role as Trump’s personal attorney and the monthly installments he received, purportedly as income for future legal services but intended as reimbursement for the payment to Daniels. He portrayed himself as Trump’s protector, willing to take the fall for his actions, and revealed his efforts to shield Trump’s identity through the use of Essential Consultants LLC. Despite occasional deception, even to his own wife, Cohen described Trump as a micromanager who demanded to be kept informed of all situations, particularly regarding nondisclosure agreements with other women.
The courtroom witnessed a subdued Cohen, offering deliberate responses under direct examination, while Trump, visibly disengaged, spent much of the day with his eyes closed, occasionally expressing disapproval through headshakes prompted by Cohen’s testimony. Cohen’s admission of disappointment at not being considered for chief of staff under Trump’s administration added a personal dimension to his portrayal of their relationship. Notably, Trump’s entourage, including his son Eric Trump, senior campaign adviser Susie Wiles, and Senator Rick Scott, lent a notable presence in the gallery during Cohen’s testimony, a presence not seen in days prior.
With Cohen’s testimony providing a detailed account of Trump’s involvement in the hush money scheme and his dynamic with Cohen, the trial continues to unfold with each revelation shaping the narrative of the prosecution’s case against Trump.
Day 15: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 10th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-10-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-10-24—–
In the ongoing Trump trial involving the falsification of business records and election interference, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, is positioned as a pivotal witness. Prosecutors are relying on Cohen’s testimony to support their allegations that Trump illicitly altered business records by concealing reimbursements to keep payments hidden prior to the 2016 election. However, Cohen’s credibility is under scrutiny due to his own legal troubles, including federal charges related to campaign finance violations, tax crimes, and lying to Congress. The Manhattan District Attorney’s case heavily depends on how the jury perceives Cohen’s credibility, making his testimony a potential make-or-break factor.
Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche, has sought to limit Cohen’s public statements about the trial and Trump, emphasizing the sensitivity surrounding the case. Despite prosecutors’ instructions to refrain from public commentary, Cohen has posted on social media mentioning Trump during the trial, raising concerns about his compliance with legal guidelines. While Judge Merchan has stated that he can not gag a witness, he did however request that the prosocution team give Cohen a message directly from the bench requesting that he refrain from any such further actions. Meanwhile, Trump himself appeared relaxed, exchanging smiles with former White House assistant Madeleine Westerhout, who testified regarding Trump’s signing habits and his relationship with Allen Weisselberg, the former Trump Org. Chief Financial Officer.
For the remainder of the day prosecutors called custodial whitnesses to the stand presenting crucial evidence, including cell phone records and text messages, as well as a records chart showing a timeline of transactions from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust as well as Donald J. Trump’s personal account, further corroborating Cohen’s claims and the unraveling of the Trump deal. Text exchanges between Stormy Daniels’ former manager Gina Rodriguez and the National Enquirer’s then editor in chief Dylan Howard shed light on the behind-the-scenes machinics of the deal briefly going sour in mid-October due to not paying “when they said they would” and attempts to “buy more time”, further corroberating earlier testimony form Daniels and Keith Davidson. With two more witnesses expected to testify, the prosecution aims to conclude their case by the end of the following week, leaving uncertainty about the duration of Trump’s defense phase, especially regarding his potential testimony.
Trump’s defense team objected to the introduction of former Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg’s severance agreement into evidence, citing potential prejudice against their client. However, prosecutors argued that Weisselberg’s absence from the witness stand was justified, anticipating his invocation of the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination. Judge Merchan proposed a compromise, suggesting a closed-door session with Weisselberg to gauge his potential testimony’s relevance, potentially prolonging the trial’s duration. These legal maneuvers underscore the high stakes and complexity of the Trump hush money trial, with each decision impacting the case’s trajectory and outcome.
Day 14: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 9th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-09-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-09-24—–Defense Evidence – 05-09-24—–
Stormy Daniels continued her testimony in the trial, steadfastly defending her narrative regarding the alleged sexual encounter with Donald Trump. During the cross-examination, Trump’s attorney probed Daniels on perceived discrepancies in her various interviews, particularly regarding details about the dinner preceding the encounter and her assertion of feeling threatened at the time. Despite the rigorous questioning, Daniels maintained the authenticity of her account. Furthermore, Trump’s attorney delved into Daniels’ financial affairs, insinuating that she profited from the alleged encounter, pointing to her “Make America Horny Again” strip club tour and earnings from a documentary.
In a separate testimony, former Trump aide Madeleine Westerhout provided insights into the inner workings of the Trump administration, shedding light on Trump’s work habits and preferences. Notably, Westerhout described Trump’s penchant for using Sharpies and reviewing printed documents, along with his willingness to take calls during early mornings and late nights. Additionally, she detailed receiving checks from the Trump Organization in New York but didn’t directly address checks signed by Trump to his former fixer Michael Cohen, crucial to charges of falsified business records.
Westerhout, who left the White House in 2019, expressed remorse for past indiscretions and testified of her published book, “Off the Record.” in which she wrote post-White House tenure, aiming to share her experiences with the public. She also drew attention to Trump’s familial relationships, highlighting his bond with wife Melania and his family.
In response to the proceedings, Trump’s defense team sought a mistrial and modification of the gag order against him, emphasizing the necessity for Trump to publicly refute Daniels’ allegations. However, Judge Merchan denied the request to modify the gag order, citing the need to safeguard the integrity of the trial and expressing skepticism about Trump’s compliance if there were to be any modified orders. Additionally, Merchan rejected the mistrial motion by Trump’s team, attributing the perceived prejudice against Trump to his defense attorney Susan Necheles’ failure to object to certain lines of questioning during Daniels’ testimony.
Day 13: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 7th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-07-24—–People’s Evidence – 05-07-24—–Defense Evidence – 05-07-24—–
Adult film star Stormy Daniels testified about a 2006 sexual encounter with former President Donald Trump. Daniels vividly described Trump’s Lake Tahoe hotel room’s decor, furniture, and even a hygiene kit in her testimony. Trump posed partially undressed on his hotel bed, she said. However, her overly detailed testimony required Judge Juan Merchan to intervene on multiple occasions.
Daniels also testified that Trump and his former lawyer Michael Cohen wanted to buy her story after the “Access Hollywood” tape was released before the 2016 election. On Thursday, May 9th, Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles will resume her cross-examination of Daniels.
The controversy surrounding the hush money payments to Daniels are a significant aspect of the trial. Daniels signed their contract using the pseudonyms Peggy Peterson for Daniels and David Dennison for Trump. Despite Trump’s lawyers’ motion for a mistrial due to the explicit nature of Daniels’ testimony, Judge Merchan was reluctant to rule that it went so far as to call for a mistrial, albeit he did uphold most of the defense’s objections throughout the testimony. Susan Hoffinger, for the prosecution, contended that Daniels’ testimony shed light on Trump’s intent and motive for the hush money payment. Even after the mistrial request was denied, Judge Merchan did acknowledge that it was difficult controlling Daniels as a witness.
The defense accused the prosecution of aggressive trial tactics. Necheles aggressively cross-examined Daniels, accusing her of lying for profit and undermining her credibility. Daniels strongly refuted these allegations, claiming her narrative was true. Necheles also drew attention to a $130,000 payment made to Daniels before the 2016 election, indicating it resembled extortion, in a similar fashion to the line of questioning previously directed at Daniels’ attorney Keith Davidson. The trial featured extensive legal disputes over opposing narratives about the affair and attempts to hide it.
Day 12: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 6th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-06-24 —–People’s Evidence – 05-06-24—–
In a recent development, Judge Merchan has taken a firm stance against Donald Trump for repeatedly violating a gag order, issuing a warning and a $1,000 fine for each of the nine previous violations. Stressing the importance of upholding the dignity of the judicial system, Merchan warned that continued violations could undermine the rule of law and the administration of justice. Trump was handed a paper copy of the order, barring him from commenting on witnesses, court staff, or the jury. The judge’s actions signal a potential escalation should Trump continue to defy the order.
Meanwhile, the trial delved into examination of hush money payments, with former Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney testifying to invoices totaling $35,000 processed as reimbursement for a $130,000 payment to Michael Cohen. McConney’s testimony confirmed the existence of emails and financial transactions relating to the reimbursement, shedding light on the paper trail linking Trump to the payments. Trump’s lawyer sought to distance him from the financial intricacies, emphasizing Trump’s lack of involvement in the payment structure.
Additionally, Trump’s engagement in the business testimony has fluctuated, with a more pronounced involvement observed during questioning of witnesses McConney and Deborah Tarasoff. Tarasoff’s testimony, in particular, highlighted Trump’s personal involvement in signing checks and overseeing financial matters within the Trump Organization. Notably, Eric Trump’s presence in court, along with other Trump Organization representatives, underscores the familial and business dimensions at play in the trial.
As the trial progresses, Judge Merchan’s firm stance on the gag order violations sets a precedent for accountability. The testimonies regarding hush money payments offer insights into Trump’s financial dealings and his level of engagement in business matters. Trump’s presence and interactions during the trial reflect the significance of the proceedings not only legally but also within the broader context of his personal and business affairs. The unfolding events in the courtroom carry implications for the outcome of the trial and its broader ramifications.
Day 11: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 3rd, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-03-24—– People’s Evidence – 05-03-24—–
Day 11 of the Trump hush money trial saw significant developments. Hope Hicks, a spokesperson for Trump’s campaign, testified regarding the fallout from the “Access Hollywood” tape and the handling of allegations involving Karen McDougal and Michael Cohen. Hicks portrayed the tape as a crisis and discussed the campaign’s response to reports about McDougal’s deal with American Media, Inc. She denied Trump’s involvement in affairs with McDougal or Cohen, detailing conversations with Trump and Cohen, including concerns about Melania Trump’s reaction to the tape.
The trial also delved into the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape, with judges hearing a full transcript, including Trump’s controversial remarks dismissed by the campaign as “locker room talk.” Hicks provided insight into the chaos within Trump’s campaign following media coverage of the tape and shared her actions to mitigate its impact, including disseminating transcripts to campaign staffers with instructions to deny allegations.
Prosecutors advanced their case, focusing on the negotiations leading to hush money payments to McDougal and Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records related to allegedly concealing reimbursements to Cohen for the payment to Daniels. Hicks’ testimony provided insight into Trump’s awareness of the hush money payment and set the stage for future witnesses to detail the financial aspects.
Trump’s legal team intensified attacks on Cohen’s credibility, questioning his actions during the campaign and his handling of cell phones. They aimed to undermine Cohen’s role in campaign strategy and cast doubt on his reliability. Additionally, Trump’s ongoing objections to the gag order issued by Judge Merchan continued, although the judge clarified its limitations and Trump paid a previous fine for violating it. The trial remains a focal point of legal scrutiny, with each day bringing new revelations and confrontations.
Day 10: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – May 2nd, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 05-02-24—– People’s Evidence – 05-02-24 —–Defense Evidence – 05-02-24—–
In the legal saga surrounding Trump, his lawyer Emil Bove scrutinizes Davidson’s involvement in celebrity deals, suggesting they aimed to suppress damaging information through payments. Davidson counters, claiming the Trump deals resembled extortion and asserts that the payment to Stormy Daniels was a settlement rather than hush money, questioning the definition of “relationship.”
Meanwhile, another hearing grapples with Trump’s comments, with prosecutor Chris Conroy citing four recent violations of a gag order. Despite seeking fines, the DA’s office refrains from requesting jail time to avoid impeding the trial. Trump’s attorneys argue against the need for a gag order, claiming Cohen’s social media activity instigates Trump.
Jurors are exposed to recorded conversations between Cohen and Davidson, shedding light on the Daniels deal. Davidson recounts Cohen’s unreliability, leading to his involvement in the deal, while the recordings underscore Cohen’s pivotal role in the case.
In the courtroom, Davidson paints Cohen as unreliable, citing missed deadlines and contentious dealings. The recordings underscore Cohen’s significance to the trial’s narrative, shaping jurors’ perceptions.
Finally, reports surface of Trump appearing to sleep during the trial, potentially a strategic move to avoid reacting to damning testimony regarding his affairs and hush money payments. These incidents add further layers of intrigue to an already complex legal drama surrounding the former president.
Day 9: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 30th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 04-30-24 —–People’s Evidence – 04-30-24—–
Former President Donald Trump has been fined $9,000 for repeatedly violating a gag order imposed by the judge overseeing his trial. This order prohibits any public discussion of witnesses or the jury. The fines came after prosecutors filed a motion to hold Trump in contempt due to his social media posts and public comments concerning individuals like Cohen, Daniels, and the jury pool. The district attorney’s office highlighted four additional comments made by Trump that were deemed to breach the order. The judge warned Trump that further violations could result in imprisonment, emphasizing that incarceratory punishment would be considered if necessary.
In legal testimony, Keith Davidson, a Los Angeles-based attorney, provided insights into his representation of McDougal and Daniels during their efforts to publicize their relationships with Trump in 2016. Davidson detailed his conversations with Dylan Howard, the then-chief content officer of American Media Inc., and negotiations with Cohen. He also shed light on Cohen’s explanations for failing to provide funding and the use of pseudonyms in contracts.
The trial also saw jurors examining Cohen’s bank activity and various aspects of Trump’s case. Testimony revealed that Cohen swiftly opened a shell company account to wire money to Daniels’ attorney, with the transaction being flagged as urgent. Cohen’s accounts were subsequently closed by First Republic Bank following the public disclosure of the payment to Daniels.
Video evidence played a significant role in the trial, with prosecutors using clips of Trump’s public statements and excerpts from his 2022 deposition in the E. Jean Carroll defamation lawsuits. Trump vehemently denied allegations of sexual assault made by women following the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape.
Throughout the trial, Trump maintained a visible presence, often surrounded by family and supporters in the courtroom gallery. Figures from his past, including his son Eric Trump, Susie Wiles, Ken Paxton, David McIntosh, and former campaign adviser Carter Page, were among those present. The trial’s atmosphere underscored the significance of Trump’s past and the individuals associated with him, with the news emerging that his attorneys had requested time off for him to attend his son Barron’s graduation.
Day 8: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 26th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 04-26-24—– People’s Evidence – 04-26-24—–
The ongoing trial involving former President Donald Trump’s hush money payments has brought forth significant testimony and evidence. Jurors have been presented with a clear paper trail detailing the establishment of a shell company and bank account by Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, to facilitate payments to individuals such as Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels. Banker Gary Farro testified about Cohen’s actions in creating Essential Consultants, the entity used to funnel funds for the hush money scheme, with further testimony expected when the trial resumes next Tuesday.
A notable aspect of the trial involves the credibility of key witnesses, such as David Pecker, the CEO of AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer. Pecker provided testimony that presented conflicting narratives, including his 2015 deal with Trump and his role as a liaison during the presidential campaign. Trump’s legal team sought to undermine Pecker’s credibility by highlighting alleged inconsistencies in his statements to federal and state prosecutors, particularly focusing on differences between his current testimony and previous interviews.
Prosecutors worked to counter these efforts by reinforcing Pecker’s credibility, emphasizing the consistency of his testimony and AMI’s acknowledgment of campaign finance violations. Pecker confirmed that AMI had admitted to violating federal election laws in connection with payments made to Karen McDougal. This attempt to reestablish Pecker’s reliability in the eyes of the jury was a crucial aspect of the trial.
Trump’s longtime assistant, Rhona Graff, also provided testimony, offering insights into her decades-long tenure managing Trump’s contacts and schedule at Trump Tower. While Graff’s testimony was relatively limited, her acknowledgment of encountering Stormy Daniels at Trump Tower added another layer to the proceedings.
In an effort to humanize Trump, the defense highlighted the positive relationships he shared with key figures involved in the trial. Pecker, described as a longtime friend and mentor to Trump, spoke warmly of him, while Graff, despite no longer working for Trump, spoke positively about her experiences working for him. These attempts to portray Trump in a favorable light amidst the legal proceedings underscored the strategic maneuvers employed by his legal team throughout the trial.
Day 7: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 25th, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 04-25-24 —–People’s Evidence – 04-25-24—–
The hearing for the gag order issued by Judge Juan Merchan, concerning former President Donald Trump, was rescheduled to May 2nd due to arguments from the prosecution claiming Trump had violated the order four additional times recently. These violations allegedly included comments made to the media outside the courtroom, in interviews, and at events.
In the trial, former American Media Inc. chairman David Pecker played a crucial role, detailing how he orchestrated payments to silence Karen McDougal regarding her alleged affair with Trump. It was David Pecker’s decision to not pay for Stormy Daniels’ story that led Michael Cohen to intervene, paying Daniels himself. Pecker’s testimony formed a significant part of the Manhattan district attorney’s case, focusing on the payments made to Daniels.
During his testimony, Pecker revealed the intricate negotiations and arrangements surrounding the payments to McDougal and the concerns he had about the legality of such actions, particularly in the context of influencing a political campaign. He discussed measures taken to avoid direct financial ties between Trump’s organization or Cohen and the payments made through American Media Inc.
Trial exhibits, including photographs and licensing agreements, were presented, corroborating Pecker’s testimony regarding the financial arrangements made with McDougal. Pecker’s recollection of events regarding Daniels’ story was also brought to light, with Cohen ultimately funding the payment to her.
Trump’s attorney cross-examined Pecker extensively, highlighting the close relationship between Trump and Pecker, as well as questioning the validity of Pecker’s memory regarding certain events. The defense attempted to challenge Pecker’s credibility and recollection, particularly regarding the timeline of events and meetings.
The hearing for the alleged violations of the gag order by Trump will be considered by Judge Merchan, with the prosecution asserting that Trump’s recent comments to the media constitute further breaches of the order. These developments underscore the ongoing legal battles and complexities surrounding the hush money trial and its implications for the individuals involved.
Day 6: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 23rd, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 04-23-24 —–People’s Evidence – 04-23-24—–
In a high-profile hearing, Judge Merchan issued a gag order against Donald Trump, restraining him from publicly discussing witnesses, the jury, or the district attorney’s team regarding an ongoing legal case. This order was later expanded to include the family members of court staff after Trump targeted Judge Merchan’s own daughter in remarks. Despite attempts by Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche, to defend Trump’s posts as political rather than case-related, Judge Merchan remained skeptical about Trump’s intentions, particularly regarding reposts on Truth Social, a platform where Trump was active. The district attorney is pushing for fines of $1,000 per violation against Trump and a reminder that further infractions could lead to imprisonment.
During the hearing, tensions between Trump’s legal team and Judge Merchan were palpable, with the judge siding with prosecutors when they declined to disclose their witness list to Trump’s team. Assistant district attorney Josh Steinglass expressed concerns about exposing trial witnesses to potential social media backlash from Trump. This dynamic illustrates the struggle for control and credibility within the legal proceedings, with Trump’s social media presence posing a unique challenge to the administration of justice.
Separately, David Pecker, former head of American Media Inc. during the 2016 election, provided significant testimony regarding “catch and kill” deals involving Karen McDougal and Trump’s doorman. Pecker revealed that he orchestrated favorable coverage for Trump and negative stories about his opponents, with Michael Cohen acting as the intermediary for media-related matters since 2007. Pecker’s testimony sheds light on the intricate web of relationships and transactions surrounding Trump’s 2016 campaign, implicating key figures and raising further questions about the campaign’s tactics and ethics.
Overall, the hearing reflects a complex legal battle characterized by disputes over communication restrictions, concerns about witness intimidation, and revelations about past dealings during Trump’s political career. The clash between Trump’s legal team and the judicial system underscores the ongoing struggle for credibility and control in high-stakes legal proceedings involving powerful political figures.
Day 5: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 22nd, 2024
—–Court Transcript – 04-22-24—–
In the ongoing criminal trial of former President Trump, both the prosecution and defense presented their opening statements, marking a historic moment. Prosecutors depicted Trump as orchestrating illegal payments aimed at influencing the 2016 election, followed by attempts to cover up these actions through falsification of business records. Their argument centered on Trump’s alleged involvement in a criminal scheme to manipulate the election, with the cover-up involving false entries in his New York business records. Conversely, defense attorney Todd Blanche vehemently defended Trump’s innocence, asserting that Trump’s involvement was limited to signing checks and discrediting the testimony of key witness Michael Cohen, highlighting Cohen’s financial stakes in tarnishing Trump’s reputation.
The trial delved into Trump’s alleged involvement in a “catch and kill” scheme, with former AMI CEO David Pecker taking the stand as a pivotal witness. This scheme, purportedly devised during a 2015 meeting involving Pecker and Cohen, revolved around the publication of favorable stories about Trump, suppression of negative stories concerning Trump’s adversaries, and the quashing of detrimental stories that could harm Trump’s electoral prospects. Pecker’s testimony was anticipated to shed light on the intricacies of the scheme and his role in facilitating nondisclosure agreements pertaining to negative Trump-related stories.
Meanwhile, legal proceedings regarding the legitimacy of a $175 million bond, crucial for Trump’s appeal in a civil fraud trial, were underway. Trump’s legal team reached an agreement with the New York attorney general’s office regarding the terms of this bond. Additionally, a hearing concerning a gag order imposed by the judge commenced, with Trump’s attorneys contesting allegations of its breach through Trump’s social media activities. They argued that Trump’s posts did not contravene the gag order and cited Cohen’s purported campaign-related attacks on Trump as justification. As the trial progressed, the jury was instructed to reconvene, signaling the commencement of the trial’s second day.
In sum, the trial witnessed contrasting narratives from the prosecution and defense regarding Trump’s alleged involvement in illegal activities aimed at manipulating the 2016 election and subsequent attempts to conceal these actions. With key witnesses such as David Pecker providing crucial testimony and legal battles over procedural matters unfolding, the trial promised to be a closely watched affair with significant implications for Trump’s legal standing and political future.
Day 4: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 19th, 2024
The final day of jury selection in the hush money trial involving former President Trump concluded with Judge Juan Merchan swearing in 12 jurors and six alternates in New York. Among the alternates, four women and one man were selected. Prosecutors focused on preparing the jurors for potentially challenging testimonies from witnesses. Emotional moments were noted during the last round of juror questions, indicating the gravity of the case.
Trump’s legal team made a strategic move to halt the trial by appealing to an appeals court, seeking to temporarily stop proceedings until a ruling was made on their appeal to change the trial venue out of Manhattan. However, their attempt was denied, with the trial set to proceed as planned. Additionally, a hearing regarding Trump’s violations of a gag order was scheduled for Tuesday, particularly concerning his discussions about potential witnesses.
With the full jury panel now seated, opening statements were slated to commence on Monday, marking the formal beginning of the trial. Despite Trump’s vocal opposition, labeling the trial a “giant witch hunt,” the legal proceedings moved forward unabated. The Sandoval hearing, held later in the day, addressed Trump’s criminal history and assessed the extent to which prosecutors could delve into it if Trump were to testify.
The question of whether Trump himself will take the stand remains unanswered, but Trump indicated a willingness to testify when directly asked. This statement adds a layer of anticipation to the trial proceedings, as the former president’s testimony could potentially significantly impact the case’s outcome. As the trial progresses, the focus will likely shift to the evidence presented and the testimonies of witnesses, with both sides vigorously advocating for their respective positions.
Day 3: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 18th, 2024
In the ongoing trial involving former President Donald Trump, the jury selection process has been marked by strategic moves from both Trump’s legal team and the district attorney’s office. Trump’s attorneys and the prosecution exhausted their allotted 10 peremptory strikes to eliminate potential jurors, with the judge rejecting Trump’s challenges to dismiss jurors with negative opinions about him. The final jury, comprising seven men and five women, includes individuals from diverse professional backgrounds such as investment banking, speech therapy, and physical therapy.
The selection process faced challenges as nearly 50 prospective jurors expressed dissatisfaction with their perceived fairness and impartiality, leading to a significant reduction in the jury pool from a second panel of 96. However, despite some jurors expressing negative views about Trump and his politics, many asserted they could set aside personal opinions to ensure fair judgment.
There were instances highlighting the unpredictability of the jury pool, including one juror’s concerns about privacy and another being excused due to past involvement in tearing down political advertisements. Trump’s legal team sought information on the prosecution’s witnesses, but their request was denied, potentially leaving them in the dark about upcoming testimonies.
As the selection process continued, some prospective jurors were yet to undergo the questionnaire process, with efforts underway to finalize a slate of alternate jurors. The trial’s procedural aspects, including the possibility of a Sandoval hearing to discuss Trump’s legal history for impeachment purposes if he testifies, were on the agenda.
In addition to legal proceedings, logistical details such as the courtroom’s temperature garnered attention, with observers noting a notably cold atmosphere. These factors underscore the complexities and nuances involved in the trial, which has drawn significant public interest and scrutiny.
Day 2: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 16th, 2024
The ongoing trial involving former President Donald Trump and allegations of hush money payments in New York reached a significant phase as seven jurors were selected for the panel tasked with determining Trump’s guilt or innocence. However, the process of jury selection has been arduous, underscored by its contentious nature, particularly regarding potential biases.
Trump’s legal team meticulously scrutinized prospective jurors’ social media activity to identify any anti-Trump sentiments, seeking to exclude such individuals from the jury pool. This approach led to a stern rebuke from Judge Juan Merchan, who warned against attempts to intimidate jurors after Trump seemingly made an audible remark to one of the jurors. Despite this, the proceedings continued, with jury selection set to resume with a new pool of prospective jurors.
The selected jurors comprise of four men and three women, with diverse backgrounds, including a foreperson from Ireland working in sales and two lawyers. Notably, most jurors exhibited no strong political opinions or biases against Trump.
Trump’s lawyers primarily focused their questioning on jurors’ perceptions of Trump himself, attempting to discern any predispositions that could influence their judgment. While the judge dismissed some jurors for cause based on their social media activity, Trump’s team also utilized peremptory challenges to exclude others.
The trial’s prosecution, represented by Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass, focused on preparing jurors for the case’s complexities, emphasizing the importance of assessing witness credibility and evidence impartially. Conversely, Trump’s legal team concentrated on jurors’ views of Trump, aiming to ensure a fair trial for the former president.
Judge Merchan aims to conclude jury selection promptly, with the hope of commencing opening statements soon. However, the fluid nature of the court schedule means there’s uncertainty regarding when a full jury will be established, underscoring the trial’s complexity and significance.
Day 1: The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump – April 15th, 2024
In a significant moment, former US President Donald J. Trump appears as a defendant in Manhattan Criminal Court for the first time. The courtroom is filled with ninety-six potential jurors, some of whom may be selected for the jury overseeing the prosecution of the Republican presidential contender on charges related to falsifying business records and campaign finance violations.
During the proceedings, Trump speaks sparingly, acknowledging his rights as a criminal defendant on three occasions. He engages in discussions with his legal team, exchanging notes as they review motions with the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.
Judge Juan Merchan directs up to 42 questions to each prospective juror, ensuring a thorough selection process.
Upon leaving the courtroom, Donald Trump expresses dissatisfaction, falsely asserting that the judge had decided to prohibit him from attending his son’s graduation. However, Judge Merchan clarifies that no decision has been made on the matter and will be considered closer to the graduation date, accounting for the court’s schedule.
Inside the courtroom, only six reporters and a sketch artist are present, forming a protective pool to report on the proceedings firsthand, while approximately a hundred journalists observe via closed-circuit TV screens. Trump closely follows the arguments on the defense table’s computer screen as his lawyers contend against the use of certain evidence in the trial.
The majority of jurors maintain a composed demeanor upon taking their seats and learning of Trump’s status as the accused party.
This marks the commencement of the first criminal trial involving a former president. Trump is scheduled to return to the defendant’s table on Tuesday, where prospective jurors will undergo further questioning to determine their suitability for the trial.